Discover Refinitiv
MyRefinitiv Refinitiv Perspectives Careers
Created with Sketch.
All APIs Questions & Answers  Register |  Login
Ask a question
  • Questions
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Unanswered
Search:
  • Home /
  • TREP APIs /
  • RFA /
avatar image
Question by mparthasarathy · Aug 05, 2021 at 03:32 PM · treprfarfa-apic++linux

Compatibility of RFA - C++ 8.2 & newer (OMM) with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.X - 64 bit

The "RFA API Compatibility matrix" Excel workbook doesn't carry an "X" mark for "RFA - C++ 8.2 & newer (OMM)" against "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.X - 64 bit" : that means that they are incompatible, is that correct? Which RFA C++ version is compatible for use with RHEL 8.x?

People who like this

0 Show 0
Comment
10 |1500 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
▼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users

Up to 2 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 512.0 KiB each and 1.0 MiB total.

1 Reply

  • Sort: 
avatar image
REFINITIV
Best Answer
Answer by umer.nalla · Aug 05, 2021 at 03:53 PM

Hi @mparthasarathy

As RFA is an older non-strategic APIs it is usually later to be qualified with newer OS versions.

At present, the estimates for RHEL8 are November 2021 for RFA C++ 8.2 and October 2021 for RFA Java 8.2

Comment
wasin.w

People who like this

1 Show 0 · Share
10 |1500 characters needed characters left characters exceeded
▼
  • Viewable by all users
  • Viewable by moderators
  • Viewable by moderators and the original poster
  • Advanced visibility
Viewable by all users

Up to 2 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 512.0 KiB each and 1.0 MiB total.

Watch this question

Add to watch list
Add to your watch list to receive emailed updates for this question. Too many emails? Change your settings >
9 People are following this question.

Related Questions

RFA C++ 8.2: Which of the Linux release lib files should be used with RHEL 7.9?

Bad directory data with multiple clients

Is there a planed obsolescence for the RFA C++ 7.4 and 7.5 version?

Building RFA based application with gcc-8.2.0 (c++17 standard)

Enumerator object for values requested for fields: PRIMACT_TP ( 270 ) / SC_ACT_TP1 ( 280 )

  • Copyright
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Statement
  • Terms of Use
  • Anonymous
  • Sign in
  • Create
  • Ask a question
  • Spaces
  • Alpha
  • App Studio
  • Block Chain
  • Bot Platform
  • Connected Risk APIs
  • DSS
  • Data Fusion
  • Data Model Discovery
  • Datastream
  • Eikon COM
  • Eikon Data APIs
  • Electronic Trading
    • Generic FIX
    • Local Bank Node API
    • Trading API
  • Elektron
    • EMA
    • ETA
    • WebSocket API
  • Intelligent Tagging
  • Legal One
  • Messenger Bot
  • Messenger Side by Side
  • ONESOURCE
    • Indirect Tax
  • Open Calais
  • Open PermID
    • Entity Search
  • Org ID
  • PAM
    • PAM - Logging
  • ProView
  • ProView Internal
  • Product Insight
  • Project Tracking
  • RDMS
  • Refinitiv Data Platform
    • Refinitiv Data Platform Libraries
  • Rose's Space
  • Screening
    • Qual-ID API
    • Screening Deployed
    • Screening Online
    • World-Check One
    • World-Check One Zero Footprint
  • Side by Side Integration API
  • TR Knowledge Graph
  • TREP APIs
    • CAT
    • DACS Station
    • Open DACS
    • RFA
    • UPA
  • TREP Infrastructure
  • TRKD
  • TRTH
  • Thomson One Smart
  • Transactions
    • REDI API
  • Velocity Analytics
  • Wealth Management Web Services
  • Workspace SDK
    • Element Framework
    • Grid
  • World-Check Data File
  • 中文论坛
  • Explore
  • Tags
  • Questions
  • Badges