Why SEQNUM is in order but QUOTIM_MS is not?

Horace
Horace Newcomer

Here is the log I receive:

  1. 2016-12-09T22:23:25,711 [NQZ6],{NO_ASKORD1=5, SPARE_TS1=14:23:25:000:000:000, SEQNUM=3.4544904E7, ASKSIZE=34.0, ASK_COND_N=1, ASK=4879.75, ASK_TIME1=14:23:25:000:000:000, ASK_TIM_MS=51805581, SEQNUM_QT=3.4544904E7, QUOTIM_MS=51805581}
  2. 2016-12-09T22:23:25,711 [NQZ6],{NO_BIDORD1=7, BID_TIME1=14:23:12:000:000:000, SPARE_TS1=14:23:12:000:000:000, SEQNUM=3.4544907E7, BID_COND_N=0, BID=4879.25, BIDSIZE=9.0, BID_TIM_MS=51792696, SEQNUM_QT=3.4544907E7, QUOTIM_MS=51792696}

May I ask why SEQNUM(2>1) is in order but QUOTIM_MS(2<1) is not?

Thanks!!

Best Answer

  • Jirapongse
    Jirapongse ✭✭✭✭✭
    Answer ✓

    I have verified the data in the tick history and found the same data as yours on 9 Dec 2016 at 14:23:25 GMT, as shown below.

    image

    I have contacted the content team to verify the data. The case number is 05126039.

Answers