Posting using OMM consumer

Posting
using OMM consumer

Hi
developer community

I'm using right now the RFA 7.6 java
API. I'm trying to create an OMM consumer which will contribute prices to an
ADH.

I'm using an off stream contribution (using
login session), and then I'm trying to post messages.

Assuming that I'm contributing to a
service X with a RIC Y, in each contribution (initial one or the updates), I’m
using those parameters:

payloadOMMMsg.setMsgType(OMMMsg.MsgType.POST); 
payloadOMMMsg.setIndicationFlags(OMMMsg.Indication.POST_INIT | OMMMsg.Indication.POST_COMPLETE);

The problem is that in the ADH, I'm
seeing the number of active contributor incrementing on each updates, and in
the logs, it seems that my RIC is created each time, meaning that the updates
are not handled by the first RIC created. Could you explain me what I missed?

My
goals is to contribute on a specific RIC Y, if it exists that’s cool, if not,
the ADH should create it, after that, I should send price update to this
specific RIC using OMM posting. How can I do that if my last approach is wrong?

Regards,

Find more posts tagged with

trep

rfa

OMM

posting

rfa-api

Accepted answers

umer.nalla

Hi @haytham.feki-ext

What are you seeing in the log to indicate the record is being created each time?

Have you confirmed this by consuming the Post record?

e.g. Post to Record Y initially with several Fields and then post again with only a subset of those Fields.

Consume the record after the 1st post and confirm all the fields are present. After the 2nd post confirm that it did not remove (or blank) the Fields that were only present in the first Post.

All comments

umer.nalla

Hi @haytham.feki-ext

What are you seeing in the log to indicate the record is being created each time?

Have you confirmed this by consuming the Post record?

e.g. Post to Record Y initially with several Fields and then post again with only a subset of those Fields.

Consume the record after the 1st post and confirm all the fields are present. After the 2nd post confirm that it did not remove (or blank) the Fields that were only present in the first Post.

haytham.feki-ext

Thanks for the quick response,

I did not jave access to logs right now, our architecture team has left. I will post tomorrow the logs, and will try your approch.

Give you the feedback tomorrow.

Thanks a lot

EXPLORE OUR SITES