Both the RFAJ v7.5 and UPAJ v8.0 Developer Guides document that an ADD Action on an OMMMapEntry (OMMMapEntry.Action.ADD in RFA terms) is used to add or replace an entry.
We are using this Action to affect a Map Entry replace however, it seems as though the ADS (v2.5.0.L1 in our case) is instead ignoring the update and not modifying the Item’s entry within its cache. As a result, any concurrent subscriptions for the same Item will result in an outdated image being returned by the ADS from its cache.
Is this a known issue, or are we doing something wrong on our side?
Any insight into whether this is an issue with the ADS, our implementation / understanding of the correct OMM usage would be greatly appreciated.