Unexpected sort results using get_data from the Eikon Python API

Using version 0.1.7 of the Python Eikon API, I'm seeing some unexpected results when attempting to sort my data. Using the TR_Field function, it provides both the direction of the sort and the priority within the overall sorting expression. The documentation states the highest priority is 0 and the default is None. While there is no description of what 'None' means, I'm assuming if the field is set to None, then this field is not part of the sort algorithm.
For example,
>>> bid=tr.TR_Field('BID')
>>> bid
{'BID': {'sort_dir': 'asc'}}
Doesn't set the sort_priority. I'm assuming because it is not defined within the expression, it must be set to none. Therefore, any data I request for that asks for bid, will not attempt to sort - will display based on the order of the instruments I'm interested in.
However, when I explicitly set the priority to 0, it doesn't seem to make a difference. (See screenshot below).
When I set the priority to 1, I then see the expression include the priority which I would expect the sorting would take affect. However, based on the example within the screenshot below, the data is not ascending, but descending.
As a further test, I explicitly set the sort_dir to 'desc'. When I do this, the display sorts the data - but in ascending order.
This behavior is not expected.
Answers
-
I came across this problem myself. It's a bug. The following is some code within the eikon module data_grid.py that corresponds to the get_data function.
if sort_priority:field[field_name]['sort_priority'] = sort_priority
When sort_priority is set to 0, the if check evaluates to False. Thus it gets no sort_priority.
0 -
From my test, it works fine with series data.
bid = ek.TR_Field('TR.HIGHPRICE', sort_dir='desc')
parameters={'SDate':'2016-01-01', 'EDate':'2016-02-01', 'Frq' : 'D'}
data_grid, err = ek.get_data(["AAPL.O", "IBM.N"],bid, parameters=parameters)
data_grid
It may be designed to work with series data by sorting the data within the same RIC.
0 -
Re-visiting this issue, I tested with version 1.0.1.
Note: The TR_Field is documented as a helper function to build the field for the get_data function.
Running some tests with the latest version, I found 4 separate issues (see screen shots):
For Issue 4, the documentation needs to be corrected.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 6 AHS
- 36 Alpha
- 166 App Studio
- 6 Block Chain
- 4 Bot Platform
- 18 Connected Risk APIs
- 47 Data Fusion
- 33 Data Model Discovery
- 682 Datastream
- 1.4K DSS
- 613 Eikon COM
- 5.2K Eikon Data APIs
- 10 Electronic Trading
- Generic FIX
- 7 Local Bank Node API
- 3 Trading API
- 2.9K Elektron
- 1.4K EMA
- 248 ETA
- 552 WebSocket API
- 37 FX Venues
- 14 FX Market Data
- 1 FX Post Trade
- 1 FX Trading - Matching
- 12 FX Trading – RFQ Maker
- 5 Intelligent Tagging
- 2 Legal One
- 23 Messenger Bot
- 3 Messenger Side by Side
- 9 ONESOURCE
- 7 Indirect Tax
- 60 Open Calais
- 275 Open PermID
- 44 Entity Search
- 2 Org ID
- 1 PAM
- PAM - Logging
- 6 Product Insight
- Project Tracking
- ProView
- ProView Internal
- 22 RDMS
- 1.8K Refinitiv Data Platform
- 625 Refinitiv Data Platform Libraries
- 5 LSEG Due Diligence
- 1 LSEG Due Diligence Portal API
- 4 Refinitiv Due Dilligence Centre
- Rose's Space
- 1.2K Screening
- 18 Qual-ID API
- 13 Screening Deployed
- 23 Screening Online
- 12 World-Check Customer Risk Screener
- 1K World-Check One
- 46 World-Check One Zero Footprint
- 45 Side by Side Integration API
- 2 Test Space
- 3 Thomson One Smart
- 10 TR Knowledge Graph
- 151 Transactions
- 143 REDI API
- 1.8K TREP APIs
- 4 CAT
- 26 DACS Station
- 121 Open DACS
- 1.1K RFA
- 104 UPA
- 191 TREP Infrastructure
- 228 TRKD
- 915 TRTH
- 5 Velocity Analytics
- 9 Wealth Management Web Services
- 83 Workspace SDK
- 11 Element Framework
- 5 Grid
- 18 World-Check Data File
- 1 Yield Book Analytics
- 46 中文论坛