RIC deletion using C# .NET

Hi @THUANTRU.HANG

Can you share the code snippet you are using?

According to the ATS documentation,

900]: Service Denied The record name is incorrect or does not exist.

How are you specifying the name of the RIC to delete? You should be using FID -1 to specify the RIC code you wish to delete.

Hi @Umer Nalla,

The record name is exactly the name which I have created the RIC before.

Enclosed is the function to create and to delete RICs

//---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

public void Insert_Update(uint iPostID, string strService, string strRIC, string[] arrFID, string[] arrValue, string strPPE)

{

PostMsg postMsg = newPostMsg();

postMsg.MsgModelType = RDM.MESSAGE_MODEL_TYPES.MMT_MARKET_PRICE;

postMsg.IndicationMask = PostMsg.IndicationMaskFlag.MessageInit | PostMsg.IndicationMaskFlag.MessageComplete | PostMsg.IndicationMaskFlag.WantAck;

AttribInfo attribInfo = newAttribInfo();

attribInfo.NameType = RDM.INSTRUMENT_NAME_TYPES.INSTRUMENT_NAME_RIC;

attribInfo.ServiceName = newRFA_String(strService);

attribInfo.Name = newRFA_String(strRIC);

postMsg.AttribInfo = attribInfo;

postMsg.PostID = iPostID;

RespMsg respMsg = newRespMsg();

respMsg.MsgModelType = RDM.MESSAGE_MODEL_TYPES.MMT_MARKET_PRICE;

respMsg.RespType = RespMsg.RespTypeEnum.Update;

respMsg.AttribInfo = attribInfo;

System.DateTime current = System.DateTime.Now;

m_recordInsertFormat.ClearInsertList();

for (int i = 0; i < arrFID.Count(); i++)

{

m_recordInsertFormat.AddItem(newRFA_String(arrFID[i]), newRFA_String(arrValue[i]));

}

respMsg.Payload = m_recordInsertFormat.EncodedBuffer();

postMsg.Payload = respMsg;

if (strPPE.Length > 0)

{

// Permission data may be included in the PostMsg for the user to be permissioned to post

// information, using the PostMsg.PermissionData property.

int serviceId = 267;

int peOperator = ThomsonReuters.RFA.DACS.AuthorizationLock.OperatorEnum.OR;

List<uint> peList = newList<uint>();

// peList.Add(10004);

peList.Add(uint.Parse(strPPE));

ThomsonReuters.RFA.Common.Buffer buffer = new ThomsonReuters.RFA.Common.Buffer();

ThomsonReuters.RFA.DACS.AuthorizationLock authLock = new ThomsonReuters.RFA.DACS.AuthorizationLock(serviceId, peOperator, peList);

ThomsonReuters.RFA.DACS.AuthorizationLockData lockData = new ThomsonReuters.RFA.DACS.AuthorizationLockData();

ThomsonReuters.RFA.DACS.AuthorizationLockStatus retStatus = new ThomsonReuters.RFA.DACS.AuthorizationLockStatus();

ThomsonReuters.RFA.DACS.AuthorizationLockData.LockResultEnum result = authLock.GetLock(lockData, retStatus);

if (result != ThomsonReuters.RFA.DACS.AuthorizationLockData.LockResultEnum.LOCK_SUCCESS)

{

authLock.Dispose();

}

byte[] c_LockData = lockData.LockData;

int c_LockDataSize = lockData.Size;

buffer.SetFrom(c_LockData, c_LockDataSize, c_LockDataSize);

postMsg.PermissionData = buffer;

}

OMMHandleItemCmd handleCmd = newOMMHandleItemCmd();

handleCmd.Msg = postMsg;

handleCmd.Handle = m_loginHandle;

m_ommConsumer.Submit(handleCmd);

Console.WriteLine("Submit Post Msg for Update");

}

//---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the for loop for deletion I use following values

for (int i = 0; i < arrFID.Count(); i++)

{

m_recordInsertFormat.AddItem(newRFA_String(arrFID[i]), newRFA_String(arrValue[i]));

}

arrFID.Count = 2

arrFID[0] = -1

arrFID[1] = -8

arrValue[0] = "RICTODELETE"

arrValue[0] = "ATS"

The input parameter strRIC has the value "ATS_DELETE_ALL"

Hi @THUANTRU.HANG

Its been a while since I used ATS and I am not in a position to test this right now, but I dont beleive you need to specify the Business Unit (BU) when deleting a record.

Please try again without the -8 FID and its value.

If that does not work, I recommend you raise an API Support Ticket so that we can carry out some detailed investigation offline.

If you cannot access the Support Ticket link, please speak to your Refinitiv Account manager or try creating a ticket via the My.Refinitiv page against the ATS product.

@THUANTRU.HANG

Can you please turn on RSSL Trace in RFA? so we can see incoming and outgoing message RFA send and receive from Provider server. You may following the instruction from this post to turn on RSSL trace file.

@Umer Nalla,

I have remove -8 FID and its value. The result is the same [900]: Service DeniedNackCode.

When I try to open "API Support Ticket" i get this apisupportticket.jpg,

I will try to create a ticket via the My.Refinitiv page if there are no further instruction.

I use MSVS 2015, DACS8_lib_NET120.dll, DACS8_lock_NET120.dll and RFA8_NET120.dll.

@moragodkrit,

I have modified the RFA.cfg as described in the post, but there are no incoming and outgoing message regarding RIC deletion.

Can you please take a look, whether the configurations are ok ?

My RFA.cfg

/***************************************************************************************/

\Connections\<Connection_RSSL>\traceMsgToFile = true
\Connections\<Connection_RSSL>\tracePing = true
\Connections\<Connection_RSSL>\traceMsgFileName = "RSSLConsumerTrace"
\Connections\<Connection_RSSL>\traceMsgDomains = "all"
\Connections\<Connection_RSSL>\traceRespMsg = true
\Connections\<Connection_RSSL>\traceReqMsg = true
\Connections\<Connection_RSSL>\traceMsgHex = false
\Connections\<Connection_RSSL>\traceMsgMaxMsgSize = 200000000
\Connections\<Connection_RSSL>\traceMsgMultipleFiles = true

\Connections\Connection_SSLED_RMDS_Sub\traceFilterOutRequests="false"
\Connections\Connection_SSLED_RMDS_Sub\traceFilterOutCloses="false"
\Connections\Connection_SSLED_RMDS_Sub\traceFilterOutStatuses="false"
\Connections\Connection_SSLED_RMDS_Sub\traceFilterOutRefreshes="false"

\Sessions\Session1\connectionList = "Connection_RSSL"
\Logger\AppLogger\windowsLoggerEnabled = false
\Logger\AppLogger\fileLoggerEnabled = true
\Logger\AppLogger\useInternalLogStrings = true

/***************************************************************************************/

My rfa.log

/***************************************************************************************/

[Wed Aug 21 09:45:24 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Information: Config Tree for the RSSL_Cons_Adapter is not found, using default configuration

[Wed Aug 21 09:45:24 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Information: The RSSL_Cons_Adapter initialization succeeded

[Wed Aug 21 09:45:24 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Information: Using the following configuration for RSSL_Cons_Connection_Manager "Default::Connection_RSSL": requestQueueReadThreshold = 1, watchListTableSize = 10007, requestTimeout = 45000, itemPostTimeout = 15000, payloadCacheEnabled = False, payloadCacheLoadFileDictionary = True, payloadCacheDictionaryName = RDMFieldDictionary, payloadCacheDictionaryPerService = False, Connection capabilities: OMMMsgConnCapability

[Wed Aug 21 09:45:24 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Warning: Batch request size may be limited due to throttling on RSSL_Cons_Connection "Default::Connection_RSSL MyTestServer.com:14002"

[Wed Aug 21 09:45:24 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Information: Using the following configuration for RSSL_Cons_Connection "Default::Connection_RSSL MyTestServer.com:14002": hostName = "MyTestServer.com", rsslPort = "14002", interfaceName = "localhost", compressionType = 0, channelBlocking = false, recvBufSize = 65535, sendBufSize = 65535, writeBufferMaxFragmentLength = 6144, connectionWaitTimeout = 30000, connectionPingTimeout = 30000, guaranteedOutputBuffers = 400, numInputBuffers = 20, tcp_nodelay = True, throttleEnabled = True, throttleType = count, throttleMaxCount = 250, throttleBatchCount = 10, traceMsg = False, traceMsgToFile = False, dictionaryRequestTimeout = 45

[Wed Aug 21 09:45:25 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Information: RSSL channel init in progress for connection "Default::Connection_RSSL MyTestServer.com:14002".

[Wed Aug 21 09:45:25 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Information: RSSL channel connected for connection "Default::Connection_RSSL MyTestServer.com:14002".

[Wed Aug 21 09:45:25 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Information: RSSL channel connected with "Requested version: 14.1, Connected version: 14.1" for connection "Default::Connection_RSSL MyTestServer.com:14002".

[Wed Aug 21 09:45:25 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Information: RSSL channel on connection "Default::Connection_RSSL MyTestServer.com:14002" has negotiated ping timeout set to: 30000

[Wed Aug 21 09:45:25 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Information: Connection Status Changed, RSSL_Cons_Connection "Default::Connection_RSSL MyTestServer.com:14002" State: "Up" StatusCode: "None" StatusText: Connection up

[Wed Aug 21 09:45:25 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Warning: Connection "Connection_RSSL" does not support views. View requests will be converted to full item requests for this connection.

[Wed Aug 21 09:45:25 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Warning: Connection "Connection_RSSL" does not support Pause/Resume. Pause and Resume requests for this connection will be ignored.

[Wed Aug 21 09:45:25 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Warning: Connection "Connection_RSSL" does not support optimized Pause/Resume. Optimized Pause/Resume requests will be converted to individual item Pause/Resume requests for this connection.

[Wed Aug 21 09:46:18 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Warning: Connection "Connection_RSSL" does not support views. View requests will be converted to full item requests for this connection.

[Wed Aug 21 09:46:18 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Warning: Connection "Connection_RSSL" does not support Pause/Resume. Pause and Resume requests for this connection will be ignored.

[Wed Aug 21 09:46:18 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Warning: Connection "Connection_RSSL" does not support optimized Pause/Resume. Optimized Pause/Resume requests will be converted to individual item Pause/Resume requests for this connection.

[Wed Aug 21 09:54:33 2019]: (ComponentName) Static: (Severity) Information: RSSL Channel closing on connection "Default::Connection_RSSL MyTestServer.com:14002" due to "requested disconnect"

/***************************************************************************************/

@THUANTRU.HANG

Are you using connection named "Connection_RSSL"?, please change <Connection_RSSL> to Connection_RSSL.

Note that if you add the configuration to a right Connection, RFA will generate XML file named RSSLConsumerTrace_<pid>.xml under running directory and it's separated from RFA.log.

rsslconsumertrace-21816.zip@moragodkrit,

thank for the hint.

Now I get the messages logged.

I created a RIC named TESTTRU10 and it works. Then I wanted to delete it but it fails.

Can you please take a look at the log file ?

Thanks.

Hi @THUANTRU.HANG

A quick look at the trace file, I can see a FieldList in the payload of the ATS_RM_CREATE PostMsg you send for the record creation, but the FieldList is empty on the ATS_DELETE_ALL PostMsg.

So, it would appear the field list is not correctly encoded for the delete message.

@THUANTRU.HANG

The ATS_DELETE_ALL can be used to delete any records. Therefore, you need to specify the RIC name in the field list via the X_RIC_NAME (-1) field. For exmaple:

<postMsg domainType="RSSL_DMT_MARKET_PRICE" streamId="1" containerType="RSSL_DT_MSG" flags="0x66 (RSSL_PSMF_HAS_POST_ID|RSSL_PSMF_HAS_MSG_KEY|RSSL_PSMF_POST_COMPLETE|RSSL_PSMF_ACK)" postId="1" postUserId="0" postUserAddr="0.0.0.0" dataSize="42">
    <key  flags="0x3 (RSSL_MKF_HAS_SERVICE_ID|RSSL_MKF_HAS_NAME)"  serviceId="267" name="ATS_DELETE_ALL"/>
    <dataBody>
<!-- rwfMajorVer="14" rwfMinorVer="0" -->
        <updateMsg domainType="RSSL_DMT_MARKET_PRICE" streamId="0" containerType="RSSL_DT_FIELD_LIST" flags="0x8 (RSSL_UPMF_HAS_MSG_KEY)" updateType="0 (RDM_UPD_EVENT_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED)" dataSize="13">
            <key  flags="0x2 (RSSL_MKF_HAS_NAME)"  name="ATS_DELETE_ALL"/>
            <dataBody>
                <fieldList flags="0x8 (RSSL_FLF_HAS_STANDARD_DATA)">
                    <fieldEntry fieldId="-1" data="5445 5354 2E42 4B"/>
                </fieldList>
            </dataBody>
        </updateMsg>
    </dataBody>
</postMsg>

@Umer Nalla,

instead of -1 I use X_RIC_NAME and it works. Normally in Excel we can use FID name or FID number in RtGet() and RtContribution(). Therefore I have mixed it, for creating I use FID names and for deleting I used FID numbers, that why it does (not) work.

I don't know whether it is intended to from your side to do it this way. If it I would say it is a "bug".

However thanks for the help.

Regards,

Tru

/***********************************************************************************/

Now in the for loop for deletion the parameters have following values (and it works)

for (int i = 0; i < arrFID.Count(); i++)

{

m_recordInsertFormat.AddItem(newRFA_String(arrFID[i]), newRFA_String(arrValue[i]));

}

arrFID.Count = 1

arrFID[0] = "X_RIC_NAME"

arrValue[0] = "RICTODELETE"

The input parameter strRIC has the value "ATS_DELETE_ALL"