This is the last question in https://community.developers.refinitiv.com/questions/62900/ema-java-is-it-possible-to-open-a-stream-in-a-paus.html
To summarize, after sending a paused register request below
long handle = consumer.registerClient(EmaFactory.createReqMsg().pause(true)...);
the following request would only trigger one single RefreshMsg to be sent, no messages after that, it's as though the stream were still paused.
consumer.reissue(EmaFactory.createReqMsg().pause(false), handle);
How do I put the stream back to an unpaused state so that all subsequent messages would be received?
The issue has been raised as Real-Time SDK issue 151 in GitHub.
Hi @sumedh.suede,
Sorry. I miss your question. You can resume a stream using the following code.
consumer.reissue(EmaFactory.createReqMsg().initialImage(false).interestAfterRefresh(true), handle);
EDIT: I have tried this on EMA 1.5 but it seems not work. The reissue still is sent with pause flag.
Hello @sumedh.suede
Could you please enable the XML trace log and share your trace when the problem occurs? You can set the XML trace by setting <XmlTraceToStdout value="1"/> in the EmaConfig.xml file?
I tried
long handle = ommConsumer.registerClient(EmaFactory.createReqMsg().serviceName("XXX").name("EUR=").pause(true)); ommConsumer.reissue(EmaFactory.createReqMsg().pause(false).initialImage(false).interestAfterRefresh(true), handle);
Below is the redacted XML trace, as @veerapath.rungruengrayubkul said, the pause flag was still set in the resume request.
<!-- Outgoing Reactor message --> <!-- java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/10.222.9.245:40162 remote=/10.220.65.193:14002] --> <!-- Fri Aug 14 10:40:25 BST 2020 --> <!-- rwfMajorVer="14" rwfMinorVer="1" --> <REQUEST domainType="MARKET_PRICE" streamId="5" containerType="NO_DATA" flags="0x246 (HAS_PRIORITY|STREAMING|HAS_QOS|PAUSE)" Qos: Realtime/TickByTick/Static - timeInfo: 0 - rateInfo: 0 priorityClass="1" priorityCount="1" dataSize="0"> <key flags="0x03 (HAS_SERVICE_ID|HAS_NAME)" serviceId="000" name="EUR="/> <dataBody> </dataBody> </REQUEST> <!-- Incoming Reactor message --> <!-- java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/10.222.9.245:40162 remote=/10.220.65.193:14002] --> <!-- Fri Aug 14 10:40:25 BST 2020 --> <!-- rwfMajorVer="14" rwfMinorVer="1" --> <REFRESH domainType="MARKET_PRICE" streamId="5" containerType="FIELD_LIST" flags="0x1FA (HAS_PERM_DATA|HAS_MSG_KEY|HAS_SEQ_NUM|SOLICITED|REFRESH_COMPLETE|HAS_QOS|CLEAR_CACHE)" groupId="5" seqNum="53710" permData="XXXX XXXX XX" Qos: Realtime/TickByTick/Static - timeInfo: 0 - rateInfo: 0 State: Open/Ok/None - text: "All is well" dataSize="2071"> <key flags="0x07 (HAS_SERVICE_ID|HAS_NAME|HAS_NAME_TYPE)" serviceId="000" name="EUR=" nameType="1"/> <dataBody> <fieldList flags="0x09 (HAS_FIELD_LIST_INFO|HAS_STANDARD_DATA)" fieldListNum="99" dictionaryId="1"> <fieldEntry fieldId="1" data="XXXX"/> </fieldList> </dataBody> </REFRESH>
<!-- Outgoing Reactor message --> <!-- java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/10.222.9.245:40162 remote=/10.220.65.193:14002] --> <!-- Fri Aug 14 10:40:50 BST 2020 --> <!-- rwfMajorVer="14" rwfMinorVer="1" --> <REQUEST domainType="MARKET_PRICE" streamId="5" containerType="NO_DATA" flags="0x266 (HAS_PRIORITY|STREAMING|NO_REFRESH|HAS_QOS|PAUSE)" Qos: Realtime/TickByTick/Static - timeInfo: 0 - rateInfo: 0 priorityClass="1" priorityCount="1" dataSize="0"> <key flags="0x03 (HAS_SERVICE_ID|HAS_NAME)" serviceId="000" name="EUR="/> <dataBody> </dataBody> </REQUEST>
Hi @wasin.waeosri and @veerapath.rungruengrayubkul
Is this a bug that I need to raise on GitHub?
Hello @sumedh.suede
Yes, I have tested the same code and got the same XML stack trace and API behavior.
I suggest you submit an issue to development team in GitHub issue page directly.