Is batchSize and flushTimerInterval helpful to improve the latency?
Greetings all
Currently, we found our app has latency issue when message input rate to be around 60,000-80,000 per second, is there any way to improve this?
We have removed as much unnecessary code as possible from the processEvent, but seems not enough.
Is some change in configuration would help? Like batchSize and flushTimerInterval? Frankly speaking I've tested these two config items in my environment but still have no clue what this functionality supposed to work.
Any suggestion would be much appreciated!
BR.
Best Answer
-
The application improve the performance by using the horizontal scaling to distribute the process of response/update messages between multiple CPU cores while running a single process on the machine. This would increase the response message throughput of the application.
With horizontal scaling concept, the application can have many sessions and having its own connection to the infra e.g. 4 sessions with 4 connections. The number of items subscribed per session should be equally distributed, i.e. total number of items divided by 4. This will reduce the update rates per channel and increase TCP Buffer Sizes according to number of connections.
Below is the example design of the application applied horizontal scaling with 4 sessions/connections:
Please be informed that the horizontal scaling may not be fully beneficial to applications when the number of threads is higher than the number of the machine CPU’s cores. For example, with 7-sessions-and-7-connections, there will be seven RFA threads (session-connection) and seven application threads (for event processing) when the merged thread model (sharedConnections = false) is used. Ideally, these 16 threads (7 RFAs + 7 applications) should be distributed among 16 CPU cores to be fully efficient.
For more detail of horizontal scaling, please refer to section 14.5.6 Horizontal Scaling in the RFA Developer Guide document (<RFA Package>\Docs).
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 3 Polls
- 6 AHS
- 37 Alpha
- 167 App Studio
- 6 Block Chain
- 4 Bot Platform
- 18 Connected Risk APIs
- 47 Data Fusion
- 34 Data Model Discovery
- 704 Datastream
- 1.5K DSS
- 633 Eikon COM
- 5.2K Eikon Data APIs
- 14 Electronic Trading
- 1 Generic FIX
- 7 Local Bank Node API
- 6 Trading API
- 3K Elektron
- 1.5K EMA
- 258 ETA
- 566 WebSocket API
- 40 FX Venues
- 16 FX Market Data
- 1 FX Post Trade
- 1 FX Trading - Matching
- 12 FX Trading – RFQ Maker
- 5 Intelligent Tagging
- 2 Legal One
- 25 Messenger Bot
- 3 Messenger Side by Side
- 9 ONESOURCE
- 7 Indirect Tax
- 60 Open Calais
- 283 Open PermID
- 47 Entity Search
- 2 Org ID
- 1 PAM
- PAM - Logging
- 6 Product Insight
- Project Tracking
- ProView
- ProView Internal
- 24 RDMS
- 2.1K Refinitiv Data Platform
- 845 Refinitiv Data Platform Libraries
- 4 LSEG Due Diligence
- LSEG Due Diligence Portal API
- 4 Refinitiv Due Dilligence Centre
- Rose's Space
- 1.2K Screening
- 18 Qual-ID API
- 13 Screening Deployed
- 23 Screening Online
- 12 World-Check Customer Risk Screener
- 1K World-Check One
- 46 World-Check One Zero Footprint
- 45 Side by Side Integration API
- 2 Test Space
- 3 Thomson One Smart
- 10 TR Knowledge Graph
- 151 Transactions
- 143 REDI API
- 1.8K TREP APIs
- 4 CAT
- 27 DACS Station
- 122 Open DACS
- 1.1K RFA
- 107 UPA
- 196 TREP Infrastructure
- 232 TRKD
- 918 TRTH
- 5 Velocity Analytics
- 9 Wealth Management Web Services
- 101 Workspace SDK
- 11 Element Framework
- 5 Grid
- 19 World-Check Data File
- 1 Yield Book Analytics
- 48 中文论坛