Is a SYMBOL_LIST subscription just a layer on top of chains structure (using ETA)?

Client inquiry based on ETA C use for access to BDS-like list.

Is a SYMBOL_LIST subscription just a layer on top of chains structure? For example if I subscribe to 0#CL: via SYMBOL_LIST domain will I just get the contents of rics 0#CL:, 1#CL:, etc in a RSSL_MAP format?

Can I specify a PDP code when requesting a symbol list?

Can I specify a PE?

Find more posts tagged with

eta-api

#content

Accepted answers

Jirapongse

@timothy.kaneshige

Thank you for reaching out to us.

As far as I know, a SYMBOL_LIST subscription is not a layer on top of chains structure.

Chain subscriptions use the MARKET_PRICE domain while the symbol list subscriptions use the SYMBOL_LIST domain. They use different domain models. However, not all chain RICs support the SYMBOL_LIST domain, such as 0#.SETI.

Regarding 0#CL:, this RIC supports both MARKET_PRICE and SYMBOL_LIST domains.

Yes, with the SYMBOL_LIST domain, the application will get all items in MAP.

No, you can't specify PE and PDP in the request.

All comments