About new feature in DSS 12.1 on ISO 15022 35B field

This new feature:
"Corporate Actions ISO 15022 35 B changes; x character set restriction relaxed to correctly display RICs and Ticker Symbols with unsupported characters. CIN Code added to Standard Events."
Why relaxed the X character set? That will crash ISO decoder if any non-ISO characters... Why not using the SWIFT EBCDIC code for all those special char?
I have an open case about an issue with a $ sign in a 35B field. The $ is not allowed in the 35B format. The $ is reserved to separate different ISO messages.
I have also another issue in the output of CorporateActions extraction in ISO from DSS, some CrLF in the output are " r n" instead of "\r\n". ThomsonReuters Dev team are on it but no ETA for the moment...
Regards
Stephane
Best Answer
-
Thank you very much for your feedback Stephane.
Per MDPUG Principle 14 ("Valid Characters for the
description of the Security"):"...The group confirmed that where they are not
using FIN for delivery, they would not be limiting the characters used to those
of the ‘x character set’. It is a requirement and valued added service to
provide the exact legal name of a stock/company, for example..."I raised this point with the MDPUG on May 15th 2018 -
seeking clarification in relation to RICs and Ticker Symbols in particular.The outcome was as follows:
"For /RICC/ and /TS/ the conclusion was that Data
Source Schemes were exempt from the ‘x character set’ restrictions requiring
the use of escape sequences for outliers.Examples are:
- /RICC/WFE_pa.N (underscore)
- /RICC/DEA0D0P4=MU (equals)
- /TS/Y&G (ampersand)"
In keeping with this, the intention of DSS 12.1 was to
relax the existing constraints for /RICC/ and /TS/ specifically and
exclusively.Unfortunately, as a result of an undetected defect,
the scope of application was wider and I apologise for the associated
disruption.I shall request that the underlying policy matter be
added to the agenda of the next MDPUG Meeting (July 31st) for further
discussion and review our plans in light of the conclusions.The end of message marker is "-}$" and that
string, with that meaning, would not arise within 35B.Best Regards,
Paul Barnes
0
Answers
-
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the reply.
Are you sure about the end of message? For me the end of message is "-}", the "$" is here to separate messages... as we don't have on the last message when we get multiple messages.
Regards
Stephane
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 3 Polls
- 6 AHS
- 36 Alpha
- 166 App Studio
- 6 Block Chain
- 4 Bot Platform
- 18 Connected Risk APIs
- 47 Data Fusion
- 34 Data Model Discovery
- 689 Datastream
- 1.4K DSS
- 627 Eikon COM
- 5.2K Eikon Data APIs
- 11 Electronic Trading
- 1 Generic FIX
- 7 Local Bank Node API
- 3 Trading API
- 2.9K Elektron
- 1.4K EMA
- 255 ETA
- 559 WebSocket API
- 39 FX Venues
- 15 FX Market Data
- 1 FX Post Trade
- 1 FX Trading - Matching
- 12 FX Trading – RFQ Maker
- 5 Intelligent Tagging
- 2 Legal One
- 24 Messenger Bot
- 3 Messenger Side by Side
- 9 ONESOURCE
- 7 Indirect Tax
- 60 Open Calais
- 279 Open PermID
- 45 Entity Search
- 2 Org ID
- 1 PAM
- PAM - Logging
- 6 Product Insight
- Project Tracking
- ProView
- ProView Internal
- 23 RDMS
- 2K Refinitiv Data Platform
- 708 Refinitiv Data Platform Libraries
- 4 LSEG Due Diligence
- LSEG Due Diligence Portal API
- 4 Refinitiv Due Dilligence Centre
- Rose's Space
- 1.2K Screening
- 18 Qual-ID API
- 13 Screening Deployed
- 23 Screening Online
- 12 World-Check Customer Risk Screener
- 1K World-Check One
- 46 World-Check One Zero Footprint
- 45 Side by Side Integration API
- 2 Test Space
- 3 Thomson One Smart
- 10 TR Knowledge Graph
- 151 Transactions
- 143 REDI API
- 1.8K TREP APIs
- 4 CAT
- 27 DACS Station
- 121 Open DACS
- 1.1K RFA
- 106 UPA
- 194 TREP Infrastructure
- 229 TRKD
- 918 TRTH
- 5 Velocity Analytics
- 9 Wealth Management Web Services
- 96 Workspace SDK
- 11 Element Framework
- 5 Grid
- 19 World-Check Data File
- 1 Yield Book Analytics
- 48 中文论坛