Hi all,
so I using the
com.reuters.sfc.inserts.general.Insertclass of JSFC 3.5.6.
No only a subset of RICs.
eg AT0000A0Z751=CENT failed on DCSIP (giving up): (409) String Too Big
Br
Hi, recently we are receiving this error " failed on DCSIP (giving up): (2) No Such Record Name" ...
konstantinos.kartsonakis
Newcomer
in TREP APIs
Hi, recently we are receiving this error " failed on DCSIP (giving up): (2) No Such Record Name" whilst sending prices over the sfc API. Can someone please help?
Tagged:
0
Best Answer
-
The problem should be the content of the 1000 (GV1_TEXT) and 1001 (GV2_TEXT) fields.
From the data dictionary, the size of these fields is 6.
GV1_TEXT "GV1 TEXT" 1000 NULL ALPHANUMERIC 6 GV2_TEXT "GV2 TEXT" 1001 NULL ALPHANUMERIC 6
However, in the trace data, the size of these fields is 8.
- 1e 31 30 30 30 1f 32 30 2e 36 35 30 37 36
"31 30 30 30" is FID 1000 GV1_TEXT and its data (32 30 2e 36 35 30 37 36) is 20.65076. Its size is 8 which exceeds the size defined in the data dictionary - 1e 31 30 30 31 1f 32 32 2e 39 35 30 37 36
"31 30 30 31" is FID 1001 GV2_TEXT and its data (32 32 2e 39 35 30 37 36) is 22.95076. Its size is 8 which exceeds the size defined in the data dictionary
This could cause the "(409) String Too Big" error.
0 - 1e 31 30 30 30 1f 32 30 2e 36 35 30 37 36
Answers
-
Hello @konstantinos.kartsonakis,
In order for the community to better understand your question and try to help, please provide all the pertaining info.
For example:
Version of SFC.
What the application is doing, consuming/suscribing the RIC, insert on the RIC, publishing data on the RIC.
It seems the application was functioning as expected up till recently? Were there any code changes, entitlement changes, infra changes or upgrades, please describe.
Any other relevant details that could be helpful
-AHS
0 -
Hi,
to be honest I am not sure which version is it. At least older than 2012. The programm didn't change and the purpose is to contribute prices to RICS (We are sending market data eg Bid, Ask etc , for our financial certificates.
Kind regards
Kostas
0 -
I would compile the list of RICs that have recently started causing issues on contribution,
and check them with your local market data team, confirm the RICs remain available on your infrastructure and permissioned to the contributing user.
0 -
Hi,
the rics are still available as they are our own emitted certificates and they are older than the problem.
PS Sorry for the delayed answer but I just returned from holidays.
Kind regards
Kostas
0 -
as I already answered:
Hi,
to be honest I am not sure which version is it. At least older than 2012. The programm didn't change and the purpose is to contribute prices to RICS (We are sending market data eg Bid, Ask etc , for our financial certificates.
Kind regards
Kostas
the rics are still available as they are our own emitted certificates and they are older than the problem.
0 -
Hello @konstantinos.kartsonakis,
Are all the RICs causing the issue on contribution, or a subset of the RICs? If a subset, which RICs?
Are you contributing via MarketLink?
Would need to know the version of the API that you are using to make sure you are still supported:
0 -
@konstantinos.kartsonakis
I'm afraid it's not possible for us to help you with this issue having only the information you already provided. Would you mind responding to questions in the comment from @zoya faberov? You should expect that we'll need a lot more detail before the root cause is identified or before we can provide any helpful suggestions.0 -
Hi all,
so I using the
com.reuters.sfc.inserts.general.Insert
class of JSFC 3.5.6.
No only a subset of RICs.
eg AT0000A0Z751=CENT failed on DCSIP (giving up): (409) String Too Big
Br
0 -
Hello @konstantinos.kartsonakis,
Some thoughts:
From the original error message it looked like you were trying to contribute to a non-existent RIC.
While the last error message, combined with the fact that some of the RICs contribute as expected, appears to indicate that the app attempts to contribute a fid content that is longer then the maximum length that is defined by the dictionary for that fid?
In terms of approach, if some RICs contribute, while others do not it may be helpful to try to understand what is different about the failing ones?
0 -
Hi,
thanks for the answer, for example the first idea was the description field but this is not the case as we limit all the descriptions (field = 3) to 16 characters.
There must be a way to find out the source of the problem. Eg the problematic field or the problematic value.
RIC is definitely active.
Best regards
Konstantinos Kartsonakis
0 -
The last error "failed on DCSIP (giving up): (409)" looks to be generated by your app tier?
Is your app is printing all the errors reported by JSFC?
Please include the error reported at JSFC level at the time of the failure, do you log at "processInsertFailed" ? What do you see?
0 -
You can set *ipcTraceFlags to 11 in the JSFC configurations in order to enable data tracing in JSFC.
*ipcTraceFlags : 11
With the data tracing, we may be able to identify the problem.
0 -
Hi, partially yes, 409 is the servicename and the "String Too Big" is the result of the Insert.text() method on the processInsertFailed(Insert insert) callback. Is there any performance issues when we set this flags?
0 -
Yes, data tracing will affect performance of the application.
0 -
Hi again,
thanks for your answer. So I simply should put to
com.reuters.utility.config.XConfigDb
object by using the
com.reuters.utility.config.XConfigDb.addVariable(String arg0, Object arg1)
the values you mentioned?
If yes where should I expect to see the relevant teracing informations?
Kind regards
Konstantinos Kartsonakis
0 -
The tracing should appear in the Java Console. It looks like:
Jan 03, 2019 9:35:30 AM com.reuters.ssl.api.SSLLogger traceData
FINER:
Thread: JSFC Event Thread 0
Connection 0
SEND:
msg_type: (0)
eventClass: SSL.EC_DEFAULT_HANDLER (0)
eventType: SSL.ET_INSERT (36)
serviceName: API_ELEKTRON_EPD_RSSL
serviceId: 0
itemName: JPY=
statusState: S_NO_CHANGE (4)
statusCode: NONE (0)
requestId: 2
group: 0
requestType: 0
priorityClass: 0
priorityCount: 0
dataTypeFormat: UNKNOWN (0)
dataTypeDescriptor: 0
dataLength: 12
data:
00000 1c 33 31 36 1d 4a 50 59--3d 1f 30 1c |.316.JPY-=.0. |0 -
Hi all,
the output looks like this:
05.02.2019 17:11:30 [FINER]:
Thread: JSFC Event Thread 0
Connection 0
RECEIVE:
msg_type: PT1BE_INSERT_NAK (23)
eventClass: SSL.EC_INSERT_RESPONSE (2)
eventType: SSL.ET_INSERT_NAK (14)
serviceName: DCSIP
serviceId: 2
itemName: AT0000A1TJL6=CENT
statusState: S_NO_CHANGE (4)
statusCode: IN_DENIED_BY_SRC (2)
text: (409) String Too Big
requestId: 7
group: 0
requestType: 0
priorityClass: 0
priorityCount: 0
dataTypeFormat: UNKNOWN (0)
dataTypeDescriptor: 0best
Kostas
0 -
Hi,
just to elaborate the issue is still present and unfortunately from the tracing we were not able to find any helpful information.
Best regards
Kostas
0 -
Please share the SSL insert message of AT0000A1TJL6=CENT that causes the INSERT_NAK. We should verify the content in that SSL insert message.
0 -
05.02.2019 17:11:30 [FINER]:
Thread: JSFC Event Thread 0
Connection 0
SEND:
msg_type: (0)
eventClass: SSL.EC_DEFAULT_HANDLER (0)
eventType: SSL.ET_INSERT (36)
serviceName: DCSIP
serviceId: 0
itemName: AT0000A1TJL6=CENT
statusState: S_NO_CHANGE (4)
statusCode: NONE (0)
requestId: 7
group: 0
requestType: 0
priorityClass: 0
priorityCount: 0
dataTypeFormat: UNKNOWN (0)
dataTypeDescriptor: 0
dataLength: 412
data:0 -
00000 1c 33 31 36 1d 41 54 30--30 30 30 41 31 54 4a 4c |.316.AT0-000A1TJL|
00010 36 3d 43 45 4e 54 1e 33--1f 46 4c 55 20 54 4c 1e |6=CENT.3-.FLU TL.|
00020 31 32 37 31 1f 2b 34 33--2f 31 2f 35 31 35 20 32 |1271.+43-/1/515 2|
00030 30 2d 34 38 34 1e 39 36--38 1f 52 43 42 30 31 1e |0-484.96-8.RCB01.|
00040 39 39 37 1f 30 2e 31 1e--37 38 1f 41 54 30 30 30 |997.0.1.-78.AT000|
00050 30 41 31 54 4a 4c 36 1e--31 30 35 36 1f 52 43 30 |0A1TJL6.-1056.RC0|
00060 4b 56 4a 1e 31 30 35 32--1f 54 75 72 62 6f 20 52 |KVJ.1052-.Turbo R|0 -
00070 65 74 20 4c 6f 6e 67 1e--31 30 30 30 1f 32 30 2e |et Long.-1000.20.|
00080 36 35 30 37 36 1e 31 30--30 31 1f 32 32 2e 39 35 |65076.10-01.22.95|
00090 30 37 36 1e 31 30 35 34--1f 42 6f 6e 75 73 6c 76 |076.1054-.Bonuslv|
000a0 2e 20 42 61 72 72 69 65--72 1e 33 39 33 1f 31 2e |. Barrie-r.393.1.|
000b0 34 39 30 1e 32 37 35 1f--31 2e 35 31 30 1e 39 37 |490.275.-1.510.97|
000c0 35 1f 20 1e 39 38 35 1f--35 30 30 30 1e 32 32 1f |5. .985.-5000.22.|
000d0 31 2e 34 39 30 1e 32 35--1f 31 2e 35 31 30 1e 36 |1.490.25-.1.510.6|0 -
000e0 1f 31 2e 35 30 30 1e 31--39 1f 31 2e 35 30 30 1e |.1.500.1-9.1.500.|
000f0 39 36 31 1f 31 2e 35 32--30 1e 32 38 35 1f 30 38 |961.1.52-0.285.08|
00100 3a 30 39 1e 32 31 1f 31--2e 34 37 30 1e 39 36 33 |:09.21.1-.470.963|
00110 1f 31 2e 34 39 30 1e 37--39 1f 30 34 20 46 65 62 |.1.490.7-9.04 Feb|
00120 20 32 30 31 39 1e 31 33--1f 31 2e 34 37 30 1e 39 | 2019.13-.1.470.9|
00130 35 39 1f 31 2e 34 39 30--1e 32 38 37 1f 30 38 3a |59.1.490-.287.08:|
00140 31 34 1e 31 32 1f 31 2e--35 30 30 1e 39 35 37 1f |14.12.1.-500.957.|0 -
00150 31 2e 35 32 30 1e 32 38--36 1f 30 38 3a 30 39 1e |1.520.28-6.08:09.|
00160 31 31 1f 30 2e 30 32 1e--39 39 38 1f 20 1e 31 30 |11.0.02.-998. .10|
00170 30 33 1f 20 1e 39 39 36--1f 20 1e 39 39 39 1f 20 |03. .996-. .999. |
00180 1e 38 30 30 1f 20 1e 38--30 31 1f 20 1e 31 36 1f |.800. .8-01. .16.|
00190 31 30 20 4e 6f 76 20 32--30 31 37 1c |10 Nov 2-017. |0 -
data:
00000 1c 33 31 36 1d 41 54 30--30 30 30 41 32 33 44 56 |.316.AT0-000A23DV|
00010 37 3d 43 45 4e 54 1e 33--39 33 1f 32 33 2e 36 32 |7=CENT.3-93.23.62|
00020 30 1e 32 37 35 1f 32 33--2e 37 32 30 1e 39 37 35 |0.275.23-.720.975|
00030 1f 3f 1e 39 38 35 1f 35--30 30 30 1e 32 32 1f 32 |.?.985.5-000.22.2|
00040 33 2e 36 32 30 1e 32 35--1f 32 33 2e 37 32 30 1e |3.620.25-.23.720.|
00050 36 1f 32 33 2e 36 37 30--1e 31 33 1f 32 33 2e 36 |6.23.670-.13.23.6|
00060 31 30 1e 39 35 39 1f 32--33 2e 37 31 30 1e 32 38 |10.959.2-3.710.28|0 -
00070 37 1f 31 33 3a 32 34 1e--31 31 1f 30 2e 34 38 1e |7.13:24.-11.0.48.|
00080 39 39 38 1f 30 2e 30 32--35 34 1e 31 30 30 33 1f |998.0.02-54.1003.|
00090 2d 30 2e 30 30 32 33 1e--39 39 36 1f 30 2e 39 37 |-0.0023.-996.0.97|
000a0 1c |. |0 -
12.02.2019 14:27:10 [SEVERE]: Feb 12, 2019 2:27:10 PM com.reuters.ssl.api.SSLLogger traceData
FINER:
Thread: JSFC Event Thread 0
Connection 0
RECEIVE:
msg_type: PT1BE_INSERT_NAK (23)
eventClass: SSL.EC_INSERT_RESPONSE (2)
eventType: SSL.ET_INSERT_NAK (14)
serviceName: DCSIP
serviceId: 2
itemName: AT0000A23F74=CENT
statusState: S_NO_CHANGE (4)
statusCode: IN_DENIED_BY_SRC (2)
text: (409) String Too Big
requestId: 7898
group: 0
requestType: 0
priorityClass: 0
priorityCount: 0
dataTypeFormat: UNKNOWN (0)
dataTypeDescriptor: 00 -
I am sorry but this needs again some analysis..
0 -
It could be FID 1003 (GV4_TEXT).
GV4_TEXT "GV4 TEXT" 1003 NULL ALPHANUMERIC 6
The field's length defined in the data dictionary is 6 but the length of data in the tracing is 7.
1e 31 30 30 33 1f 2d 30 2e 30 30 32 33
FID 1003: Data = -0.0023
In JSFC, you can use the FidDefinition.length method to get the maximum length required to store fields with this fid.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 3 Polls
- 6 AHS
- 36 Alpha
- 166 App Studio
- 6 Block Chain
- 4 Bot Platform
- 18 Connected Risk APIs
- 47 Data Fusion
- 34 Data Model Discovery
- 689 Datastream
- 1.4K DSS
- 625 Eikon COM
- 5.2K Eikon Data APIs
- 11 Electronic Trading
- 1 Generic FIX
- 7 Local Bank Node API
- 3 Trading API
- 2.9K Elektron
- 1.4K EMA
- 255 ETA
- 558 WebSocket API
- 39 FX Venues
- 15 FX Market Data
- 1 FX Post Trade
- 1 FX Trading - Matching
- 12 FX Trading – RFQ Maker
- 5 Intelligent Tagging
- 2 Legal One
- 23 Messenger Bot
- 3 Messenger Side by Side
- 9 ONESOURCE
- 7 Indirect Tax
- 60 Open Calais
- 277 Open PermID
- 44 Entity Search
- 2 Org ID
- 1 PAM
- PAM - Logging
- 6 Product Insight
- Project Tracking
- ProView
- ProView Internal
- 23 RDMS
- 1.9K Refinitiv Data Platform
- 695 Refinitiv Data Platform Libraries
- 4 LSEG Due Diligence
- LSEG Due Diligence Portal API
- 4 Refinitiv Due Dilligence Centre
- Rose's Space
- 1.2K Screening
- 18 Qual-ID API
- 13 Screening Deployed
- 23 Screening Online
- 12 World-Check Customer Risk Screener
- 1K World-Check One
- 46 World-Check One Zero Footprint
- 45 Side by Side Integration API
- 2 Test Space
- 3 Thomson One Smart
- 10 TR Knowledge Graph
- 151 Transactions
- 143 REDI API
- 1.8K TREP APIs
- 4 CAT
- 27 DACS Station
- 121 Open DACS
- 1.1K RFA
- 106 UPA
- 194 TREP Infrastructure
- 229 TRKD
- 918 TRTH
- 5 Velocity Analytics
- 9 Wealth Management Web Services
- 93 Workspace SDK
- 11 Element Framework
- 5 Grid
- 19 World-Check Data File
- 1 Yield Book Analytics
- 48 中文论坛