Corrupted RDM dictionary?

We are seeing some strange behavior just after RDM dictionary is loaded – some fields of dictionary entries contain incorrect values.

The facts:

- the dictionary is loaded within a static library;

- in unit tests for that library, all fields contain correct values;

- error only reproduced when the library linked against production executable.

Output from the unit tests( the correct one):

RDM dictionary successfully loaded: 14471 entries

fid=32650: acronym=QUERY, ddeAcronym=REQUEST QUERY, fid=32650, rippleToField=0, fieldType=5, length=5100, enumLength=0, rwfType=19, rwfLength=5100

fid=4271: acronym=GUID, ddeAcronym=GLOBAL UNIQUE ID, fid=4271, rippleToField=0, fieldType=5, length=255, enumLength=0, rwfType=19, rwfLength=255

fid=12794: acronym=MET_TF_U, ddeAcronym=METRIC TM FRAME UT, fid=12794, rippleToField=0, fieldType=6, length=3, enumLength=8, rwfType=14, rwfLength=1

Output from the provider exec ( the incorrect one):

RDM dictionary successfully loaded: 14471 entries

fid=32650: acronym=QUERY, ddeAcronym=REQUEST QUERY, fid=32650, rippleToField=0, fieldType=5, length=4864, enumLength=236, rwfType=19, rwfLength=0

fid=4271: acronym=GUID, ddeAcronym=GLOBAL UNIQUE ID, fid=4271, rippleToField=0, fieldType=5, length=4864, enumLength=255, rwfType=0, rwfLength=0

fid=12794: acronym=MET_TF_U, ddeAcronym=METRIC TM FRAME UT, fid=12794, rippleToField=0, fieldType=6, length=3592, enumLength=1, rwfType=0, rwfLength=0

Does anyone have any idea what might be the problem?

Best Answer

  • DevTrev
    DevTrev Advocate
    Answer ✓

    If you could, please confirm the following:

    - Which operating system

    - Which version of UPA you are using

    - Ensure that the libraries and headers are both from that version of UPA, and that both test and the executable are using those same libraries/headers.

    It does sound like you have a version mismatch somewhere.

Answers

  • Bondy_Bo
    Bondy_Bo Contributor

    - Linux CentOS 6.5 2.6.32-504.8.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jan 27 12:21:41 PST 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

    - 7.6.1.L1.linux.rrg

    That was exactly the problem, productions execs were linked against older version of UPA (7.5.0)

    Thanks for your helpful reply

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.